Grants

Grants and Scholarships

We offer grant funding and discounted registration fees for all Western Section workshops, conferences and trainings.  We encourage you to apply for assistance if you need help to attend our events.  We will do our best to accommodate as many people as we can.  Questions?  Please email: projectmanager@tws-west.org
Grant application information
Proposals are limited to four pages
The Western Section of The Wildlife Society (TWS-WS) has historically supported conferences, symposia, workshops, trainings and studies through grants. Board members review all funding requests and make selections based on the following criteria:
  • Applicant must be a member of TWS-Western Section;
  • Consistency with TWS purposes and objectives as cited in the Western Section By-Laws;
  • Timeliness and relevance: Local and regional;
  • Western Section members who live outside of the Section geographic area must first apply for grant funding with the Section within which they reside.  Secondarily, they can apply within our Section, given that they meet the criteria of doing work on species in the Western Section region (California, Nevada, Hawaii and the Pacific Islands).
  • Proposals must demonstrate a clear need for funding and should define a time-line for project implementation, plus endorsement and/or financial support of local TWS Chapter;
  • Demonstration of shared costs; a detailed budget showing amount and use of TWS-WS grant is required;
  • Quality and brevity of submitted request;
  • Availability of funds and amount of funding requested;
  • Ability of the applicant to successfully implement the proposed project; and
  • Conference or symposium organizers receiving grant funding must submit a schedule of proposed sessions.
The Section will award grants up to a maximum of $2,000 (depending on availability of funds) for a single project or event. There is no grant award minimum. Matching funds and partnerships are not required. Any partners providing funds or in-kind services must be listed in the proposal with a letter of commitment from each. Submitted requests should attempt to address the above-listed criteria. Grant recipients must submit a report to the Executive Board at the conclusion of the event or study. In addition, if the recipient conducted a study, they must present either preliminary or final findings from that study at the annual conference.   This reporting requirement will be included in a letter from the Section which accompanies the actual disbursement of the grant.

How Parlay Bet Mechanics Actually Work, Explained at Betzonic

Parlay betting has existed in some form since the early days of organized sports wagering, but its mechanics remain misunderstood by a surprisingly large portion of recreational bettors. The appeal is straightforward: combine multiple selections into a single wager, and the potential payout multiplies with each added leg. The reality, however, involves a more nuanced set of rules governing how odds are calculated, how pushes are handled, and why the house edge compounds in ways that single-game bettors rarely encounter. Understanding the underlying structure of a parlay is essential for anyone who wants to use them deliberately rather than simply chasing inflated payouts.

How Parlay Odds Are Calculated

At its core, a parlay works by multiplying the decimal odds of each individual selection together. If you convert American odds to decimal format first, the math becomes transparent. A standard -110 moneyline bet, which is the default for most point spread wagers in North American sportsbooks, converts to a decimal odds value of approximately 1.909. A two-team parlay at -110 on both legs would therefore pay out at roughly 1.909 multiplied by 1.909, equaling about 3.64 times your stake. Most sportsbooks advertise a two-team parlay at 2.6 to 1, which is slightly lower than the true mathematical payout — that gap represents the built-in margin.

The compounding nature of parlay odds is what makes them both attractive and statistically punishing. Each additional leg does not simply add to the potential payout; it multiplies it. A three-team parlay at standard -110 juice would theoretically pay around 6.96 times the stake if calculated purely from decimal odds. In practice, most books pay 6 to 1 or use a fixed odds table that consistently undervalues the true probability-adjusted return. By the time you reach six or seven legs, the difference between the fair payout and the book’s offered payout can be enormous. This is why the overall hold percentage on parlays is significantly higher than on straight bets — industry estimates typically place it between 20 and 30 percent for parlays, compared to roughly 4 to 6 percent for single-game wagers at standard juice.

Same-game parlays, which became widely available in the United States following the Supreme Court’s 2018 ruling in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association that opened legal sports betting to individual states, introduce additional complexity. In a traditional parlay, each leg is treated as an independent event. In a same-game parlay, the selections are correlated — a quarterback throwing for 350 yards is statistically more likely to occur in a game where the over hits. Sportsbooks price same-game parlays differently to account for this correlation, and the specific methodology varies significantly between operators.

What Happens When a Leg Pushes or Is Canceled

A push occurs when a bet settles at exactly the spread or total — for instance, a team favored by three points wins by exactly three. In a straight bet, a push returns the original stake with no profit or loss. In a parlay, the treatment of a push depends on the sportsbook’s house rules, and this is an area where bettors often encounter surprises. The industry standard, and the approach used by the majority of regulated sportsbooks in the United States and Europe, is to remove the pushed leg from the parlay and reduce it by one team. A four-team parlay with one push becomes a three-team parlay, recalculated at the corresponding payout odds.

Voided legs — those canceled due to postponement, a player not participating, or a market being suspended — are generally treated the same way as pushes. The leg is removed and the parlay is recalculated downward. This matters practically because a bettor who builds a five-team parlay expecting a certain payout may receive a reduced return if one selection is voided, even if all other legs win. Some operators handle this differently for same-game parlays, occasionally voiding the entire ticket rather than recalculating, which is a policy detail worth verifying before placing the wager.

The rules around partial cashouts and early settlement further complicate parlay mechanics. Many modern sportsbooks allow bettors to cash out a portion of their parlay before all legs have settled, accepting a reduced guaranteed return in exchange for removing the remaining risk. The cashout value is calculated using the sportsbook’s current odds on the remaining legs, and the offered amount almost always reflects a margin in the book’s favor. Bettors who consistently accept cashout offers are effectively paying a second layer of juice on top of the original margin built into the parlay odds.

Correlated Parlays and How Books Restrict Them

One of the more sophisticated aspects of parlay mechanics involves correlation — the statistical relationship between two outcomes within the same game. Bettors discovered decades ago that certain combinations carry positive expected value when parlayed together precisely because their outcomes are linked. The classic example is parlaying a heavy favorite on the moneyline with the under on the total: if a dominant team controls the game and wins by a large margin, they are more likely to have held the opponent to a low score, making the under more probable. Traditional parlay rules, which treat each leg as independent, would misprice this combination.

Sportsbooks have responded in two ways. The first is outright restriction: many books explicitly prohibit certain correlated combinations in their house rules, particularly within the same game. Attempting to parlay a first-half result with the full-game result, for instance, is blocked on most platforms. The second response has been the development of same-game parlay products with proprietary pricing models that attempt to account for correlation. These products have grown substantially since their mainstream introduction around 2019 and 2020, and they represent a meaningful share of parlay handle at major operators today.

The pricing of same-game parlays is intentionally opaque. Unlike traditional parlays where a bettor can manually verify the math by multiplying decimal odds, same-game parlay odds are generated by internal models that bettors cannot easily audit. Research published by sports betting analytics firms has suggested that the effective hold on same-game parlays can exceed 30 percent in some configurations, though this varies by sport, market type, and operator. Resources that document how specific platforms structure their parlay offerings — such as the detailed breakdowns available at Betzonic — can help bettors understand what they are actually paying for when they build multi-leg same-game tickets.

Parlay Betting in the Context of Bankroll Management

From a bankroll management perspective, parlays occupy a specific and often misunderstood role. The variance inherent in parlay betting is extreme compared to flat betting on single games. A bettor placing a series of two-team parlays at standard juice will experience longer losing streaks and less frequent wins than a bettor making individual wagers on the same selections, even if the underlying picks are identical. This higher variance is not a bug in the product — it is a feature that makes parlays appealing to recreational bettors who are willing to accept a lower probability of winning in exchange for a larger potential payout.

Professional bettors and sharps rarely rely on parlays as a primary wagering strategy, precisely because the compounding margin makes it difficult to generate consistent positive expected value. There are exceptions: correlated parlays where the book has not adequately priced the relationship between legs, or situations where a bettor has identified a significant edge on multiple independent markets simultaneously. In these cases, parlaying the selections can be mathematically justified. But these scenarios are uncommon, and the vast majority of parlay volume is generated by recreational bettors responding to the psychological appeal of large potential payouts from small stakes.

The legal sports betting market in the United States has grown rapidly since 2018, with total handle exceeding 100 billion dollars annually by the mid-2020s. Parlays, particularly same-game parlays, account for a disproportionate share of operator revenue relative to their share of total handle. This is not coincidental — the product is designed to generate higher margins, and sportsbooks actively market parlay products with promotional boosts and enhanced odds to encourage adoption. Understanding the mechanics is the first step toward making informed decisions about when, if ever, a parlay is the right tool for a given betting situation.

Parlay mechanics are not inherently complex, but they are frequently obscured by marketing language and fixed payout tables that make it difficult to see the embedded margin. The fundamental principle — multiplying decimal odds across independent legs — is simple enough, but the practical details around pushes, voids, correlation restrictions, and same-game pricing require careful attention. Bettors who take the time to understand how each element works, and how the house edge compounds across multiple legs, are better positioned to evaluate whether a given parlay represents a reasonable use of their bankroll or simply an expensive lottery ticket dressed up in sports terminology.

The following information should be contained within the proposal: A TITLE PAGE with the following information only: project title, applicant’s name, institutional affiliation, address, degree being sought or highest degree obtained, telephone number, fax number, email address, total budget, amount requested from TWS, and desired starting date. The title page should also include a brief ABSTRACT of the proposed project, stating the purpose, methods, and significance of the project to conservation. An INTRODUCTION explaining the rational for the project, specific goals and objectives, and hypotheses to be tested. METHODS and PLAN OF ACTION describing data collection methods, sample size, detailed timetable, including the project’s completion date. A project BUDGET is required. Completed proposals can be e-mailed to tws-west@tws-west.org or sent to The Wildlife Society, Western Section Attn: Awards and Grants Chair, PO Box 6756, Albany, CA 94706.

Student Travel Grant

Purpose and Objectives Each year The Wildlife Society-Western Section (TWS-WS) makes funds available to students to encourage participation in professional meetings, conferences, symposia, workshops, trainings and other continuing education activities. These funds can be used for partial reimbursement of transportation, lodging, registration and meal expenses. Travel grants of up to $600 will be awarded to a limited number of students.   Eligibility An individual is eligible if they are:
  • A current dues paid members of TWS-WS (dues can be submitted with the application);
  • Current student or recent graduate (degree received within past year);
  • Western Section members who live outside of the Section geographic area must first apply for grant funding with the Section within which they reside.  Secondarily, they can apply within our Section, given that they meet the criteria of doing work on species in the Western Section region (California, Nevada, Hawaii and the Pacific Islands).
  • If more grant requests are received than funds are available, preference will go to those who have not received a Travel Grant from TWS-WS in the past 12 months.  Funds are often available so all are encouraged to apply who need assistance.
Funds will not be provided when employer or agency funds are available. Priority will be given to students living in the Western Section region who are presenting a paper or poster at TWS meetings (Parent, Western Section, Chapters).  Non-TWS and International Conferences/Symposia Travel grants to International and non-TWS conferences/symposia will only be reviewed by the Awards and Grants Committee if the requester is presenting a paper or poster at the subject conference. A travel grant may be granted contingent upon the papers acceptance by the program committee.   Amount and Conditions In most cases, the amount of an award may only cover a portion of the total cost of attending an event and applicants should consider the award only as a supplement to other funding sources. Individual awards/reimbursement will not exceed $600.00 per applicant per event or per year. Travel awards are to be used only for registration fees, meals, lodging, and or transportation expenses. Rates of reimbursement shall be as follows:
  • Mileage (personal vehicle) may be claimed at the current federal mileage reimbursement rate (Currently $0. 67 cents per mile)
  • Reimbursement may be claimed for the actual cost of a meal, not to exceed $12.00, $20.00 and $30.00 for breakfast, lunch and dinner, respectively.
  • Reimbursement may be claimed for the actual cost of lodging, not to exceed $150.00 per night.
Review and Approval Requests for funding must be submitted to the Awards and Grants Committee Chair. Proposals will be reviewed on a continual basis and support will depend on fund availability. The Awards and Grants Chair shall distribute copies to all Board members for review and consideration. Approval of requests will require a majority vote by the TWS-WS board. Priority will be given to attendees of TWS meetings (Parent, Western Section, Chapters). Each applicant must submit a written request at least 60 days in advance of attending an event. The application must clearly state the amount of support requested and identify how costs will be incurred. A statement that alternative funding is not available from any other source must be included in the application. Applicants must submit receipts for reimbursement, a statement of the professional benefits derived from attending the event and a summary evaluation of information gathered. To apply for a travel award, submit two copies of the following:
  • Completed Application Form:  Final_Application_TWS_travel_grant.pdf (PDF)
  • Abstract of paper/poster (if presenting);
  • Evidence of abstract acceptance (if required); and,
  • Draft text of paper/poster (if presenting) (2-4 pages).
Failure to provide the above requested material will disqualify the applicant. Application and all requested materials can be e-mailed to tws-west@tws-west.org or sent to The Wildlife Society, Western Section Attn: Awards and Grants Chair, PO Box 6756, Albany, CA 94706.

Past Grants Awarded by TWS-WS

  • Operation Migration – Non-profit organization that uses ultra light aircraft to return migrating Whooping cranes to eastern North America.
  • Vernal Pool Ecology Workshop
  • Scrapes in the Sand A Western Snowy Plover Documentary Film
  • 6th California Oak Symposium Proceedings
  • A single-sample, non-invasive hair-snaring device (guard hair noose) to be incorporated into existing track plate survey protocol for mesocarnivores
  • Survivorship of Western Snowy Plover ( Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus ) Broods in Humboldt County, California
  • Survivorship, Site Fidelity and Brood-Rearing Home Ranges of Western Snowy Plover ( Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus ) Broods in Humboldt County, California
  • Humboldt State University Wildlife Conclave Team
  • Sierra Nevada Science Symposium 2002
  • Northern Goshawk ( Accipiter gentiles ) Nesting Habitat on the North Coastal Region of Northern California
  • Characteristics of Storm Water Drainage Basins Used by Endangered San Joaquin Kit Foxes In an Urban Environment
  • Using Behavioral Data to Model Landscape Connectivity Based on Badger Habitat Use